Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit

Are female founding CEOs penalized when raising funds for their ventures based on industry served? Across an observational study conducted on ventures seeking funding (N = 392) and an experimental study conducted on investors allocating venture funding (N = 130), we find evidence for a “lack of fit” effect: Female-led ventures catering to male-dominated industries receive significantly less funding at significantly lower valuations than female-led ventures catering to female-dominated industries. In contrast, male-led ventures attain similar funding and valuation outcomes regardless of the gender dominance of the industries to which they cater. We confirm that this is because investors perceive lower degrees of fit between founding CEO and venture for female-led ventures catering to male- as opposed to female-dominated industries (with no perceived fit differences for male-led ventures across industries). Degree of investor sophistication emerges as a potential attenuating factor, appearing to help reduce gender bias from perceived lack of fit.

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/48/eabd7664

1 thought on “Evidence that investors penalize female founders for lack of industry fit”

  1. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google,
    and found that it is really informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels.
    I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. A lot of people will be benefited from your writing.

    Cheers! Escape room lista

Leave a comment